National Library of Australia

Teleconference 21 August 2014

Present: Catherine Argus (NLA/Chair), Ebe Kartus (ALIA/JSC Rep), Jenny Stephens (NLA), Monika Szunejko (NLA), Melissa Parent (ALIA), Rebecca Gibbs (Minutes)

Apologies: Anne Robertson (EPC Representative), David Wells (ALIA)

Start time: 2:00 pm (EST)

Welcome and apologies 

Apologies from David and Anne

Minutes of previous meetings and business arising 

Amendment to actions: Ebe to confirm if Technical Working Group papers were for discussion or response. 

Other actions: Catherine and Amelia McKenzie discussed potential for sharing JSC seat with NZ.  First step will be to contact National Library of New Zealand and sound out their views.

ACOC discussion on proposals

ACOC agreed to file final versions of proposal responses to the wiki: ACOC responses to 2014 JSC proposals. This will ensure all documents receive a final review before submitting to JSC   

6JSC/LC/28     Revision to RDA 2.4.1.8

Jenny’s draft response was endorsed by ACOC                                                                                                                                  

6JSC/ALA/31  Subject relationship element in RDA chapter 23

Catherine has prepared a skeleton draft, however recommends ACOC read 6JSC/ALA/31 in conjunction with Technical Working Group 3 before further discussion 

6JSC/ALA/28  Priority order for sources of information RDA 2.10.6.2

ACOC agrees with this proposal, however recognises that the outcome of 6JSC/BL Rep/1 may impact this proposal  

6JSC/ALA/29  Clarify core element status in distribution and manufacture statements RDA 2.9 and 2.10

ACOC generally agrees with this proposal with the assumption that publication information is present in the catalogue record.  It was noted that this proposal may be impacted on by the outcome of 6JSC/BL Rep/1 

6JSC/BL rep/1            Simplification of RDA 2/7 – 2/10

ACOC discussed this paper in terms of

  • Clarifying terminology
  • Implications of proposed scenarios
  • Recording properties as single or separate elements

The paper, which aims to reduce instructions while maintaining granularity, has relationship to 6JSC/LC/24.  ACOC will continue this discussion with reference to LC/24 

6JSC/TechnicalWG/4

ACOC generally agrees with this proposal, however does not endorse terminology “political body” and definition for jurisdiction to include judicial corporate body 

6JSC/TechnicalWG/2

ACOC began discussions on recommendations proposed in the paper. Decisions deferred to next meeting

Other business

No other business 

Next teleconference

28 August 11:00am (EST) 

Meeting closed: 3.30 pm (EST)

Meetings