ISSN 1443-0568 | no. 75 | June 2005
The The Australia-US Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act (AUSFTA Act), and the Copyright Legislation Amendment Act came into effect on 1 January 2005. Thus most of the changes to copyright law which the AUSFTA requires are now in place, by way of these pieces of legislation. Some major changes that educational and cultural institutions should be aware of are outlined here in brief. Term Extension Introduction of Performers’ Rights Libraries should note that in relation to sound recordings, performers whose performances have been recorded on a sound recording, are now considered to be ‘makers’ for the purposes of Section 97 of the Copyright Act 1968. Therefore, whereas before the AUSFTA Act, the person who owned the record in which the sound recording was embodied, was the sole copyright owner, this is no longer the case. Performers now own equal shares in the copyright of that sound recording, together with the owner of the record in which the sound recording is embodied. It should also be noted that ‘Performance’ is broadly defined under section 248A(1) of the AUSFTA Act, and includes the reading or recitation of a literary work, or a taped interview. Change of Definition of Material Form However, Sections 43A and 43B provide some important exceptions to breach by way of making such temporary copies. Section 43A provides that temporary copies made as part of the technical process of making or receiving a communication, are not a breach, as long as the communication itself is not a copyright infringement. Section 43B has been introduced with the AUSFTA amendments and provides that temporary reproductions made as a necessary part of a technical process of using a copy of work, will not be infringing, unless the copy is itself infringing or if use of the copy constitutes an infringement. Safe Harbour Provisions for Carriage Service Providers Details of the safe harbour scheme can be found in both the AUSFTA Act and the Copyright Regulations 1969 (as amended). Both can be viewed at <http://www.austlii.edu.au>. Institutions who do fall under the definition of CSP and chose to ‘opt-in’ to the scheme by following the procedures set out in the Copyright Regulations 1969, will be able to benefit from the safe-harbour provisions, which provide for immunity from civil liability. Compensation Scheme If the owner does not object, and does not pay any compensation, then the person who wishes to copy the work pursuant to the agreement is entitled to copy the work and this will not be an infringement of copyright. In conclusion, whilst the above summarises some important copyright law amendments to be aware of, libraries should expect further changes throughout the next two years, including implementation of the provisions of the AUSFTA relating to technological protection measures, and a review of the fair dealing provisions which is scheduled to commence in April this year. Stay tuned. —SARAH WALADAN is Executive Officer of the Australian Digital Alliance (ADA) and Copyright Adviser (law and policy) for the Australian Libraries Copyright Committee (ALCC). The ADA and ALCC advocate for balanced copyright laws and the interests of libraries, educational and cultural institutions, and have promoted these interests before Government throughout AUSFTA implementation. More information about these organisations, including submissions in relation to the expansion of the Australian fair dealing provisions, can be found on their respective websites: <http://www.digital.org.au> and <http://www.digital.org.au/alcc>. This information was originally published in the May 2005 issue of inCite, the news magazine of the Australian Library and Information Association, and online on ALIA’s website at <http://alia.org.au/publishing/incite/2005/05/copyright.html>. |
| Contents list for this issue of Gateways |